Images of Insanity
نویسنده
چکیده
An examination of the way the cinema has dealt with mental illness and the introspective fascination with which it has mirrored the spirit of experimentation and fragmentation of the last decade.
منابع مشابه
مفهوم جنون در قانون مجازات اسلامی؛ موضوعیت یا طریقیت
Subjectivism or Objectivism of insanity, as one of the eliminators of criminal responsibility, are challenges under attention regarding the psychotherapy findings about the criminal responsibility of the lunatics. The difference between the two is that if insanity has subjectivism to eliminate criminal responsibility, its authentication by judicial authority leads to eliminate the criminal resp...
متن کاملحمایت قانونی از ابداعات دارویی در اسناد و کنوانسیونهای بینالمللی
The human society from far era to yet has no equal treat to mental offenders and the type of response to mentioned persons had been different proportionate to promotion in human knowledge. On epoch, mental disorder be assumed the persons who has the evil ghost and then enchases them on ships to search wisdom and knowledge. But, nowadays, in some societies the opinions is on that mental disorder...
متن کاملThe impact of system design on the characteristics of Missouri's insanity acquittees.
This study describes the characteristics of Missouri insanity acquittees, which numbered 797 on July 1, 1992. Unlike reports of characterization data from other states, the study endeavors to link the characteristics to the design of Missouri's insanity acquittee system. This is accomplished by analyzing Missouri's insanity acquittee system and comparing it with the system designs and character...
متن کاملConstructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
Research consistently indicates that jurors' intuitive prototypes of insanity and case-relevant attitudes shape their verdicts more strongly than legal definitions of insanity. Based on a sample of 113 prospective jurors, this study was designed to (a) assess the extent to which three prototypes of insanity held by jurors in a past study generalize to a sample of jurors in another state and (b)...
متن کاملRevisiting the insanity defense: contested or consensus?
The author assesses the accuracy of both the public's opinion and researchers' conclusions regarding the method of adjudication of insanity cases and investigates the impact of the various types of reforms enacted in the 1980s on the degree to which insanity cases are contested. Data from seven states are analyzed. The public's view that insanity cases are typically resolved by a jury trial is ...
متن کامل